The Securities and Change Fee (SEC) has confirmed that Tesla CEO Elon Musk remains to be required to have attorneys pre-approve any tweets associated to the automaker. This comes after the SEC investigated Musk in 2018 over tweeting that he had “funding secured” to take Tesla non-public for $420 per share — inflicting fluctuations in Tesla’s share worth. The EV maker and Musk settled individually with the SEC for $20 million however admitted no wrongdoing.

Regardless of this, TechCrunch studies that Musk’s attorneys just lately tried to finish what they referred to as a “government-imposed muzzle” on his speech, stating {that a} latest jury verdict supported the enchantment.

In that case, jurors discovered that Musk’s tweets didn’t violate Rule 10b-5 — enacted in 2000 to make clear the definition of insider buying and selling — and the SEC’s arguments on enchantment lacked help. Nonetheless, the SEC took subject with Musk legal professional Alex Spiro’s argument that profitable the case supplied related authority, arguing as an alternative {that a} jury verdict in a personal securities-fraud motion will not be relevant. In the event that they discover new authorized aut hority immediately associated to the problem raised on enchantment, attorneys can submit that as a part of supporting an appellate courtroom.

The SEC’s continued battle with Musk might increase questions over defending free speech in company governance. Nonetheless, the SEC argues that shareholders want attorneys to pre-approve any tweets associated to Tesla as a result of they want correct info concerning their investments. The company believes pre-approval of Musk’s tweets may guarantee the proper info is disclosed.